A deep defect related to Fe impurities could be detected by admittance spectroscopy measurements. The solar cell parameters could be well fitted by simulation with recombination at an acceptor like deep defect in the bulk of
the CIGS layer. The simulated density of deep VE 821 defect states correlates nicely with the Fe concentration in the CIGS layer. From this we conclude that Fe replaces an In (or Ga) site in the CIGS lattice and creates an Fe-In(2+) (or Fe-Ga(2+)) deep acceptor state in the bulk of CIGS layers, which is detrimental already at a low concentration in the sub ppm range. The simulations enabled us to estimate the maximum Fe concentration in CIGS layers which is tolerable without disturbing the performance of high-efficiency CIGS solar cells. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.”
“ObjectiveThis study was undertaken to better understand the high variability in response seen when treating human subjects 17-AAG cost with restorative therapies poststroke. Preclinical studies suggest that neural function, neural injury, and clinical status each influence treatment gains; therefore, the current study hypothesized that a multivariate approach incorporating these 3 measures would
have the greatest predictive value. MethodsPatients 3 to 6 months poststroke underwent a battery of assessments before receiving 3 weeks of standardized upper extremity robotic therapy. Candidate predictors included measures of brain injury (including to
gray and white matter), neural function (cortical function and cortical connectivity), and clinical status (demographics/medical history, cognitive/mood, and impairment). ResultsAmong all 29 patients, predictors of treatment gains identified measures of brain injury (smaller corticospinal tract [CST] injury), cortical function (greater ipsilesional motor cortex [M1] activation), and cortical connectivity (greater interhemispheric Prexasertib nmr M1-M1 connectivity). Multivariate modeling found that best prediction was achieved using both CST injury and M1-M1 connectivity (r(2)=0.44, p=0.002), a result confirmed using Lasso regression. A threshold was defined whereby no subject with bigger than 63% CST injury achieved clinically significant gains. Results differed according to stroke subtype; gains in patients with lacunar stroke were best predicted by a measure of intrahemispheric connectivity. InterpretationResponse to a restorative therapy after stroke is best predicted by a model that includes measures of both neural injury and function. Neuroimaging measures were the best predictors and may have an ascendant role in clinical decision making for poststroke rehabilitation, which remains largely reliant on behavioral assessments. Results differed across stroke subtypes, suggesting the utility of lesion-specific strategies.